Brad on Alex Jones Radio Show Thursday Morning...
I'm currently scheduled to discuss the Clint Curtis story on the Alex Jones radio show tomorrow morning (Thursday) during the 11am PT (2pm ET) hour.
The live web stream for the show, if you are inclined to listen, can be heard via one of these links...
Main Live Stream
Secondary Live Stream
AM Affilliate list, Shortwave options and links to RealPlayer or WinAmp downloads as needed
UPDATE: I believe the interview went well enough. About 30 minutes. I'll try and post the audio here shortly.
UPDATE 12/10/04: I appeared again on Jones' show this morning at his request while Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org was the official guest. Details on that appearance and her reaction to my response to her statements on Curtis, all now posted here.
The live web stream for the show, if you are inclined to listen, can be heard via one of these links...
UPDATE: I believe the interview went well enough. About 30 minutes. I'll try and post the audio here shortly.
UPDATE 12/10/04: I appeared again on Jones' show this morning at his request while Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org was the official guest. Details on that appearance and her reaction to my response to her statements on Curtis, all now posted here.
6 Comments:
To the previous poster, understandinglife:
Bravo … noble thoughts and well written.
I'm one of those dumass lefties who cried during Kerry's concession speech. That's probably enough said.
For a fully fair investigation of voting fraud and Curtis’ allegations, yes, of course, idealogically, one would hope to transcend the partisan aspects of this story.
Get real tho … ain’t gonna happen in the near future. Smear, mud, dodging and politics as usual will prevail.
To BradBlog:
Well done. Balanced and real. This is an interesting and important story.
Thanks for your work.
It made me sad when Bev Harris did an Alex Jones interview, but I thought "If Ann Coulter can do it, what the hell?" Still, I hate to see this thing associated with that guy, right wing, fundie that he is; King with an Aluminum Foil Crown. I know that if I want to find the truth, it's usually wrapped in a lie... that's disinformation. Most people don't know that and I hate to see your credibility injured. You have tons of credibility with me, wary as you've been regarding the Madsen story. BTW, thanks for being yourself and doing what you do.
Is it just me or did Jeff Fisher look like someone crashing off a Manic Run? Dude, I think he's losin' it.
Alex Jones is a "conservative" and yes he's obviously religious, but he's a good source for real news that the crooks of the world are doing. The way he gives it to both sides of the political spectrum, along with those above them pulling the strings, is unmatched.
As for Bev Harris, that wonderful woman was a regular on his show long before other shows gave her the time of day. I recall her on there in late 2002/early 2003 screaming about the upcoming electronic vote fraud after she got the dirt on Diebold. All this stuff about vote fraud, the patriot acts, RFID tags, national IDs, etc that congress is pushing through is old news to Jones' listeners. 4 years ago people called him a kook. Now that a lot of the stuff he has reported on is coming to pass, he's still branded a kook. Funny. Republicans love him when he exposes people like Clinton but hate him when he exposes Bush et al (W apparently had him kidnapped after he confronted him at a speech W was doing while Gov. of Texas). Democrats love him when he rants about the current administration, but then hate him when he talks about how equally evil their precious Clintons and UN are, to name a few.
There are things that I don't like about him I'll admit, but once again, if you're looking for hard news with documents to back it up, he's a good source. He claims not to be psychic or some big "insider", but rather just reads the publicly available government documents and plans that 99.9% of the population will never bother to seek out and read.
I just finished listening to the interview. Interesting, but nothing new.
Just a quick question.
What about Curtis' unsubstantiated claim that his dog was shot after the affidavit was given.
You were the one that reported it.
You appeared on DemocraticUndergroung to answer questions but when asked to prove it your reply was rather shocking.
You told a DU'er that a police report had been filled and if the member didn't believe you he should check it out HIMSELF.
WTF?
If you later retract having been told by Curtis the dog had been shot does the story take a hit considering you broke it?
If you sticks to the story and don't prove it how can anyone serious accept ANY of this.
WHY EVEN MENTION IT WITHOUT PROVING IT.
A police report has, as I've said, been filed on the case.
I am very aware of security issues at this time, and do not wish to divulge publicly any information about Mr. Curtis' whereabouts, etc.
For those who continue to be suspicious, of course, they may check with police authorities.
I have posted additional detail (though left out various identifying matters) on this in an article I just published which answers many such questions.
As always, I will tell you what I know, and what I have learned, as long as it neither jeopardizes the safety of the individuals involved, the confidence of sources who have asked to remain unidentified at this time, or the integrity of the ongoing official investigation.
Post a Comment
<< Home